Spoolman config not included #72

Closed
opened 2026-06-24 14:20:04 +02:00 by BasK · 3 comments

Description

First of all, this bugreport is somewhat premature, since the code in question is in master, but has not been released yet. I happened to notice this problem however and hopefully it can be fixed before it becomes an actual bug,

Main issue:
The upcoming spoolman integration depends on 2 settings: a spoolman server and a sync-rate. It the original PR these were part of the config.ini.example files, but in the current master branch these settings are not present, even though the code that uses it is.

Quality of life issue:
It would be nice if these settings could also be configured from the web-ui. This is not really a bug, more a missing feature, so if it's hard to fix as part of this bug, then I'll gladly post it as a feature request after the next release that includes the spoolman integration.

## Description First of all, this bugreport is somewhat premature, since the code in question is in master, but has not been released yet. I happened to notice this problem however and hopefully it can be fixed before it becomes an actual bug, Main issue: The upcoming spoolman integration depends on 2 settings: a spoolman server and a sync-rate. It the original PR these were part of the config.ini.example files, but in the current master branch these settings are not present, even though the code that uses it is. Quality of life issue: It would be nice if these settings could also be configured from the web-ui. This is not really a bug, more a missing feature, so if it's hard to fix as part of this bug, then I'll gladly post it as a feature request after the next release that includes the spoolman integration.
BasK added the
bug
label 2026-06-24 14:20:04 +02:00
Owner

Hi, we're working on some restructuring this week. See the README on the main page. However, your suggestion is already in the current development branch. It will be released soon in the nightly branch.

Hi, we're working on some restructuring this week. See the README on the main page. However, your suggestion is already in the current development branch. It will be released soon in the nightly branch.
Author

Amazing, I'll close the bug then

Amazing, I'll close the bug then
BasK closed this issue 2026-06-24 14:25:03 +02:00
Owner

Hi @BasK,

Good catch — and thank you for reporting this before it became an active bug for users.

The [spoolman] section was present in the dev repository but was not being copied into the release repo during the sync step. Fixed: config/config.ini.example now includes the Spoolman config block and the release script has been updated to always sync it going forward.

Regarding the Web UI configuration: fully agreed — that is the logical next step. I will open a follow-up for it.

Hi @BasK, Good catch — and thank you for reporting this before it became an active bug for users. The `[spoolman]` section was present in the dev repository but was not being copied into the release repo during the sync step. Fixed: `config/config.ini.example` now includes the Spoolman config block and the release script has been updated to always sync it going forward. Regarding the Web UI configuration: fully agreed — that is the logical next step. I will open a follow-up for it.
Sign in to join this conversation.
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: viewit/KX-Bridge-Release#72
No description provided.